Greg Critser and Obesity Arguementative Essay

He moots that stigmatizing over use up in minorren get tabu be a practicable solution to polish off the increasing pestilent of puerility fleshiness. However, Critser has several enigmas joined to his plain solution to a very interlocking problem. First, Critser doesnt talk ab break by means of the difference and the rude tr takement that the great unwashed seek with corpulency face. Second, he claims Ameri ignore families atomic number 18 to blame for this epidemic, entirely very pargonnts argon the unrivaleds who be held responsible for their childrens eating styles in the start-off place.Third, by enforcing children to fend off glut will only type amiable problems associated with the accent and stress on when and how to eat their food for thought. Fourth, pargonnts should set an example on how they eat their food, because a child will act the same direction as how they see their pargonnts eating. Lastly, by stigmatizing the unwellnessy expressions out-of-pocket to fleshiness, in accordance to, trying non to shop the soulfulness or throng, touchablely is stigmatizing the children who atomic number 18 suffering from universe orotund. there atomic number 18 some(prenominal) variables involved in the epidemic of puerility corpulency that Critser does non recognize, for example the diseases or genetics that ar involved with obesity. The feasible solution Critser argues exp binglent help in the short dethaw with a decrease in childhood obesity, but in the long conk his solution will not realize the overall epidemic to end childhood obesity. To begin with, Critser never intimates the discriminating do and rude treatment that obese people lease with the minute they step out in society.Mary Ray Worley begins in her script Fat and Happy In Defense of Fat Acceptance explaining what robust people go through and through daylight to day, and involved argon all the emotions and consentient steps blubber people go through when other people see them. If youve grown up in the twentieth-century Ameri hind end society, you probably ge situate that world fat is a monstrous individualised, social, and medical liability.M some(prenominal) Ameri fuels would rather go out or cut off a limb than be fat, many another(prenominal) believe that fatness is a serious health risk, and many ar convinced that is a simple matter to reduce aces clay surface and are so offended by body fat that they believe it is acceptable to ostracize fat people and exploit them the merchant ship of cruel jokes. Those who are fat quick learn to be deeply ashamed(predicate) of their bodies and spend their lives trying to become what they are not and hide what cant be hidden. Our society believes that thinness signals will power and self-respect, whereas fatness signals self-contempt and escape of resolve. 66) Worley goes into depth on some of the thoughts that are running through obese peoples mind when going out in society. This is including all adults and children. The discrimination that obese children suffer from is long lasting evil effects. These feelings and emotions that are developed as a child can play a springy role in wizards self-consciousness along with their self-assurance and how they will conduct themselves day by day. Nowhere is the status Critser talks well-nigh the discrimination an obese person has to deal with.Critser would mention two things in his article that would affect the feelings of obese children and star of them was the feeling that obese children deal with is that pressure causes tension (1). The other thing was his solution he thinks that will end the epidemic of obesity, which was, to pock the behavior of overeating while provided not to stigmatize the person engaged in the behavior. Critser was all wrong in thinking this would actually work precisely approximately the world and not just the Westernized countries. In addition, Critser say s, No maven should be stigmatized for cosmos overweight.But stigmatizing the unhealthful behaviors that cause obesity would conform with what we know about legal health messages (1). He whence goes on to add a false parity with the campaigns a ca-cast unprotected call vote out and smoking. He first is wrong when trying to link obesity with smoking. The two problems are irrelevant to for each one other besides the fact that both(prenominal) are bad for your health. His focus on unprotected sex and homosexuals in one of his analogies takes offense to anyone who is bigoted, because heterosexuals and homosexuals are the same broad of people with assorted interests.People who are bigoted go onto discriminate them. That is a false analogy because what does unprotected sex and also homosexuals pretend to do with obesity in children. Next, Critsers solution in ways of stigmatizing the unhealthy behaviors associated with obesity and overeating is not the overall solution to supp ress this growing epidemic worldwide. The solution is one that may help slow down obesity, but his solution is such a simple solution to such a complex problem. There are many problems associated with obesity along with there are many solutions to help conquer childhood obesity.Critser is wrong that society can stigmatize overeating without stigmatizing the person engaging in the behavior. Food for thought Childrens views on the psychological aspects of childhood obesity in Educational and Child Psychology, Debbie Mansfield and Georgina Doutre discuss the psychological aspects of childhood obesity along with the childrens views and how to protect obese children from stigmatizing effects (23). Children are being stigmatized for being obese.The children are progeny to negative stereotyping and discrimination by their peers, and self-esteem issues, negative body image, depressive symptoms (Braet, Calamaro and Waite, Hesketh, Koplan, Miller and Downey 24). This proves that Critsers sol ution is not going to work. His solution wont work because, when one is trying to stigmatize the behavior of overeating, then the person who is obese is also compositors case to the stigmatization. Furthermore, the parents also play a vital role when their child is obese. Children learn through what they see especially when they are at a young age.The buttocks s one- cartridge clip(a)iers against obesity is the American family and are needed to erect their children on a dietetical constraintler to bar gluttony (1). According to Critser, this byword that the American family is a problem to childhood obesity but later says parents arent to blame. Critser uses a strawman tactic look pressure causes tension by Diamonds. This is vexd in a sense, but the way Critser uses this saying is that he leaves it at that. He says no more. He doesnt mention anything else about pressure causing tension. He just quotes Diamonds and what they present to say.The tactic kit and boodle well in his article, because this is true but it is not linked to his primary solution. childishness obesity could be related to the ignorance or denial of the negative consequences from an individual or family perspective (Davidson and Birch 24). Critser may halt with this. On the other hand, parental espousal and lack of concern regarding weight issues can be a protective calculate for the self-esteem of overweight children (Stradmeijer 24). A reading on obese children concluded that participants are accepting attitudes and mpathy towards obese children, obese children garner their own choices over their own emergency (Mansfield and Doutre 27). There were also negative consequences linked to obesity. Being obese caused a lack of friends for children, more bullying occurred, limited to varied sporting activities, and serious health consequences (Mansfield and Doutre 28). Parents can help their children in ways to avoid all these emotional consequences their obese children have t o deal with along with the psychological effects it has. Mansfield and Doutre provide a table of childrens views of subscribe toive mechanisms for obesity.Some parental landing field and encouragement could be for their children to stop lounging virtually and do more case and eat more fruits and veggies instead of snacks (Mansfield and Doutre 29). A some coping strategies would be to ignore it, their personal choice, and avoidance, accordance to that children think its not anybody elses life to choose who you privation to be and rather skinny or fat it is what you want to be (Mansfield and Doutre 29). Critser thinks that kids begettert know much, when really they look to have an understanding and knowing about the problems associated with obesity.The civilise systems try to promote exercise to prevent obesity from occurring. It is healthy for children to make their own positive choices. Instead of stigmatizing the behavior of overeating, schools can provide a real good back ground to children. Moreover, Critsers article shows weakness in some part of the article. Critser implyd a Pennsylvania state university scholar Barbara Rolls that talked about a debate she conducted. Her study noticed that the three years old children stopped eating when they were wide no matter what the portion size was, but the five year old children devoured everything that was in front of them.Earlier in the article Critser stated that kids dont know when they are full (1). another(prenominal) weakness that Critser wrote was when he mocked the experts saying that kids have the right to make bad nutritional choices. This doesnt have much support in his paper or certify along with Critser is comparing two different eras. Nutrition, Health, and Schoolchildren written by Judy Butriss states alternative dietary suggestions whether it refers to healthy snacks to the decrease of food use in a child. the dietary suggestions include A balanced, varied diet for the whole family, avoiding grazing and TV snacks, healthy snacks (fruits) as alternatives to sweets, chocolate, biscuits, whole food that take time to eat, and grill or boil food instead of frying (Butriss 294). Finally, in Critsers article he uses loaded diction and inequitable argumentation with words standardized gluttony, foot soldiers, and infantry. Critser uses the term foot soldiers in a way against obesity that we are pushing for obesity and not be to care as much. In a way that foot soldiers can be like foot soldiers that just are taught to march and march and nothing else.Critser sounded prejudice with this term. He also uses the term infantry. infantry is referring to the American family along with the term foot soldiers. The two terms go in concert and act as if the American family just keeps encouraging obesity rather than preventing it. This is unfair argumentation because this is not necessarily true. Critser is being bias in the terms he uses. The last piece of loaded verbiage C ritser uses is gluttony where he uses the term twice. The term gluttony can be be as greedy or unjustified indulgence, and many children with obesity are label as gluttonous.In the beginning of the canvass Critser says, needs to promulgate . . . dietary restraint, something our ancestors knew just as avoiding gluttony (1). Critser says that no person should be stigmatized for being overweight, but his appraisal is to stigmatize the unhealthy behaviors associate with obesity (Critser 1). This is an unfair argumentation because Critser uses the inconsiderable word gluttony a few quantify and is also bias to the idea of anti-fat. This is a mistake by using the full loaded word gluttony, because obese people have plenteous on their scale of measurement and dont need any more judgments that obesity implies.In conclusion, Critsers simple solution to such a complex problem is just not going to work. His claims that stigmatizing the behavior of overeating collectible to obesity, American families cause obesity, portion control and dietary restraint needs to be enforced, and even never to put a kid on a diet seems to not be supportive enough to back his simple solution. His loaded voice communication use of gluttony causes a problem due to the judgmental attitude it implies. Instead, this causes the many social, physical and even economical problems to rise.When one is obese this does raise the thought of a shortened life span and risks to mental diseases, due to the seclusion, one may receive just for seeing themselves as obese. The parents and school teachers come up with ways children can cope a lot easier with being obese. For example, the ways of exercise, change the behavior in how a child will eat snacks (healthy alternatives), and the knowledge that obese children can gain without the loss of self-esteem and confidence. In the end of it all, Critsers solution to stigmatize the behavior of overeating in a child is the complete reverse approach.